Richard C Hoagland is really JC.

No photographs have been proven to be better than any other, because the chain of custody always originates exclusively at NASA which cannot be independantly verified not to have tampered with the evidence.  Bara is simply spreading propaganda from NASA.

Patrick Excrement

http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Patrick-Excrement/136235759864851?sk=info

Ex Pattacakes on Facebutt

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Ex-Pattacakes/389353174482412

NASA made a big public announcement as advance promotion for the press conference where they final broke the suspense of what it was they had to say, and finally told us all at that press that extraterrestrial life was now much more likely a possibility.  Those false claims are still up on NASASS' website.  Whether the majority or what ever percentage of images from NASA may or may not be veracious, is irrelevant, as NASA has made them all incredible by lying in more than a few instances.

NASA has yet to retract it's false claims based upon a falsified bacteria from that polluted lake in the California desert, of likely hood for new life forms made during that big televised public press conference. 

They still don't provide an accurate gray scale for correcting all of the images from Mars that they release filtered in red or simply black and white.  There is no way to know one way or another what is or is not on Mars from any of the data which NASA continually obfuscates. 

Science is not a matter of innocent until proven guilty. 

Science is based upon testable theories independently validated or discredited by peer duplication of experiments. However there is a necessary element of legal and journalistic standards needed to confirm the veracity of the evidence to be evaluated; the images. 

Without independent eye witnesses to say that what the pictures are of are actually there, then all we have is the word of NASA which has deliberately undermined it's own credibility, so that nobody can be sure of what is true.  This keeps the information proprietary perhaps for the veneer of national security, but it's most likely that Russia and China have spies at NASA with access to the unadulterated raw data. 

America's enemies know the truth.  Only the American tax payer is denied benefit of their contributions.

This was censored out by Expat from his page:

Hoagland is just like Sagan, only less credible.

Sagan worked on a project to nuke the Moon. The only reason it didn't happen was because the bomb was too heavy for the rocket to carry.

Sagan used to promote the notion that the Universe must be teeming with life, "billions and billions of stars." Then, he wrote extensively about how Abductees are psychotic dreamers, who substitute ETs and UFOs for elves and fairies of bygone-days.

Hoagland says that Sagan was a double agent. Hoagland used to promote the nuclear powered Spacecraft, Project Prometheus. He went on the TV news magazine 'Good Morning America' and gave a demonstration of how nuclear radiation can be neutralized with Hyper Dimensional Physics. Now, he deletes all mention of Project Prometheus and the X-37B from his facebutt page.

Hoagland accuses all his critics as being "paid agents of disinformation." Hoagland is the pot calling the kettle, 'Black'.

Shoe at foot of Curiosity:

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-p3HxlTve2C4/ULwOiuljFiI/AAAAAAAAAEc/ob0M9d1QOLA/w497-h373/Nike4.JPG


Close up:

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-Bw7CWmGyBAk/ULwObHZA_3I/AAAAAAAAAD8/LHqFdtvhSwA/w497-h373/nike5.JPG


Higher contrast:

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-TR5MevkrlPM/ULwOn1Ry9SI/AAAAAAAAAE0/c_xBxxMUB74/w497-h373/Nike3.JPG


Nike commercial for Curiosity:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&list=PLwhgXSIAAuQjdXfyoqQWnDgOMhs1ZY7ft&v=_M0DhIA4p30

Shoe @ 2:05:21

www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&list=PLwhgXSIAAuQjdXfyoqQWnDgOMhs1ZY7ft&v=_M0DhIA4p30